An accepted paper in the Journal (Long-term demographic consequences of eavesdropping for sagebrush) by Rick Karban and colleagues explores the consequences of volatile communication in sagebrush. Read the abstract here.
I caught up with Rick to do a video interview.
Subscribe to our YouTube posts by pressing the Subscribe button on the YouTube page (search ‘JournalOfEcology’), or by using this link http://www.youtube.com/rss/user/JournalOfEcology/videos.rss in your RSS reader.
Gretchen Brownstein and company have an accepted paper in the Journal titled “Chance in plant communities: a new approach to its measurement using the nugget from spatial autocorrelation ”. Read the abstract here.
The authors have provided a short synopsis of the paper and a photo of one of their study sites on the South Island, New Zealand.
Photo credit: J. Bastow Wilson
Issue 3 is now online and features the paper by Ireland & Booth as the Editor’s Choice for this issue: “Upland deforestation triggered an ecosystem state-shift in a kettle peatland”.
You can read the Editor’s Choice article by Amy Austin in a previous blog post. Continue reading
Ishii and Harder have an accepted paper in the Journal titled “Phenological associations of within- and among-plant variation in gender with floral morphology and integration in protandrous Delphinium glaucum“. Read the paper here.
The authors have provided a short synopsis of the paper and two photos of their study species, Delphinium glaucum.
Delphinium glaucum inflorescences. Credit: Ishii & Harder.
Amy Austin discusses the Editor’s Choice for issue 3, by Alex Ireland & Robert Booth. Enjoy!
Issue 3 will appear online next week. As usual, the issue will be filled with cracking papers! Happy Easter from Journal of Ecology!
Editor´s Choice March 2012
Human impact on the landscape through alteration of vegetation is occurring globally, with conversion of natural ecosystems for food production, industry and urban areas (Foley et al. 2005). However, one of the challenges for accurately assessing these impacts is the fact that the vast majority of our ecosystems have already been modified in some way. As such, it is difficult to know what the original impacts have been from land and forest clearing that occurred in these systems at least a century ago. Perhaps even more complicated is trying to understand the impact on adjacent intact ecosystems, particularly non-point source changes in nutrient availability and biogeochemical cycling, which are critical components for understanding the integrated impact of land-use change on the landscape (Buffam et al. 2011). For example, eolian dust deposition due to human activity has increased markedly with the increase of agricultural expansion in North America (Neff et al. 2008), but at present, it is far from clear how ecosystems have been impacted from these alterations in nutrient pools and turnover.
The field site "Titus bog", studied in Ireland and Booth's paper. Photo credit: Robert K. Booth.
Laura Galloway and Kevin Burgess have a paper in Early View in the Journal titled “Artificial selection on flowering time: influence on reproductive phenology across natural light environments “. Read it here.
The authors have provided a short synopsis of the paper and an nice photo of the plant species they studied.
Photo credit: Laura Galloway